Legal Opinion

State v. Ramsey

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 3, 1992No. 1 CA-CR 90-1488PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge.

The primary issue we decide today is whether the language of the domestic violence statute, which requires prosecutorial concurrence with the judge’s decision to defer the entry of guilt, violates the separation of powers doctrine and, if so, whether the unconstitutional part may be severed. In addition, we must decide whether a biological parent whose parental rights have been legally severed is related within the second degree of consanguinity to her natural children so as to be entitled to deferred entry of judgment of guilt and probation under the domestic violence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. PrentissArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. MurphyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Cohen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. State v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People in Interest of RWVColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. GnewuchNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State v. SUPERIOR COURT, NAVAJO COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API