Legal Opinion

State v. Ramsey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2012No. SD 30846PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.

We consider whether the state proved Earl Ramsey’s constructive possession of drugs hidden in a house that he shared with another. On this record, under well-settled law, the answer is “no.”

Background

Ramsey and a woman lived in what was, in effect, a one-bedroom home.1 Police arrived with a search warrant one day as Ramsey came home. They took his key, entered the empty house, searched, and found 1.31 grams of cocaine in a bedroom wastebasket, hidden under an opaque trash bag liner.

The slender transcript (only 22 pages of trial testimony) of a one-witness bench trial,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. KerfootMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. FunkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. State v. ZimpherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. TERISA L. STEPHENSMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. PolitteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API