Duell v. Duell
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentStephens, Chief Judge
I
I agree that the default judgment entered against the appellant Duell should be set aside, but I reach this conclusion for reasons different from those stated' in the majority opinion. The majority view is that Duell’s answer was stricken and the default judgment entered against him as a penalty for contempt, and in this view Hovey v. Elliott, 1897, 167 U.S. 409, 17 S.Ct. 841, 42 L.Ed. 215, is said to apply. That case held void a decree pro confesso entered against a defendant in another proceeding where the defendant’s answer had been stricken and the decree entered as a penalty for his…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.