Legal Opinion · Dissent

Duell v. Duell

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 16, 1949No. 9699Published

1DissentStephens, Chief Judge

I

I agree that the default judgment entered against the appellant Duell should be set aside, but I reach this conclusion for reasons different from those stated' in the majority opinion. The majority view is that Duell’s answer was stricken and the default judgment entered against him as a penalty for contempt, and in this view Hovey v. Elliott, 1897, 167 U.S. 409, 17 S.Ct. 841, 42 L.Ed. 215, is said to apply. That case held void a decree pro confesso entered against a defendant in another proceeding where the defendant’s answer had been stricken and the decree entered as a penalty for his…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API