United States v. Roitman
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Roitman, owner and vendor of the property hereinafter mentioned, and Rosenthal, his employee, are charged with the unlawful possession of certain stills, copper coils, condensers,' still heads, coloring matter, and similar property, averred to he designed for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, intended for use in violating title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 4 et seq.) in violation of that act (27 USCA). The information avers that defendants well knew that the said property was so designed for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. Defendants have…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Collins v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Todd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. MarescaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- United States v. CasinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. LotempioDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932