Gelfand v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, Judge
In this suit, plaintiffs seek refund of Federal income taxes for the years 1950-53. The controversy focuses upon section 117 (m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 19391 — more familiarly recognized as the “collapsible corporation” provisions.2 This section, first introduced into the Internal Revenue Code in 1950, was designed to prevent use of the corporate form as a means of escaping ordinary income treatment through the guise of accelerated capital gains. The issue here is whether the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was correct in claiming that section 117 (m) required plaintiffs to treat as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Raymond G. Burge and Kathleen E. Burge v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Arthur Glickman Herman Glickman and Ruth Glickman and Aaron Glickmand and Freda Glickman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Braunstein v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Todd Tibbals and Helen A. Tibbals v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Investment Annuity, Inc. v. BlumenthalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- SchecterUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Walls v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009