Legal Opinion
Clark v. Ferzli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 18, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated April 18, 2000, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for leave to amend her complaint to add a cause of action to recover damages based on a lack of informed consent, and the plaintiff cross-appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the same order as purportedly denied that branch of her motion which was to strike the answers of the defendants George Ferzli, Jerzy Macura, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Katz v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Jolly v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Smith v. BessenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Gribbin v. KearnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Marcus v. RahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Akgul v. Prime Time Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hill International, Inc. v. Town of OrangetownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Pinola v. KittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026