Legal Opinion

Tam v. Federal Deposit Insurance

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 14, 2011No. Case No. CV 08-06458 MMM (AJWx)Published

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

On July 11, 2008, the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) closed IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. (“IndyMac”) and appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as the bank’s receiver pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1821(c)(2)(A). That same day, the FDIC formed IndyMac Federal Bank, a newly chartered depository institution, and transferred IndyMac’s insured deposits to it. The FDIC made deposit insurance determinations for accounts held at IndyMac and notified depositors of the determinations via letter. Some depositors,…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API