Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 4, 1937No. 4-4728Published

1DissentMehaeey, J.

I cannot agree that this court has the right to amend or suspend the statute of limitations. The opinion on rehearing says: “Upon these considerations onr former opinions are modified' to the extent of now holding1! that the right to sue is suspended where lands or town lots have been sold to the state, and that this suspension is not dependent upon the validity or invalidity of the sale to the state. The right is suspended in either case, as the state cannot he divested of its paramount lien for its taxes, whéther the sale was good or had. It must 'also follow from this holding that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pietsch v. MilbrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Lewis v. Pawnee Bill's Wild West Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1907
  3. Sims v. CumbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
  4. Sparks v. FarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  5. Hutton v. McCleskeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API