Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beth A. Madden v. City of Iowa City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 13, 2014No. 13–0673Published

1DissentMansfield, Justice

I respectfully dissent. As I read Iowa Code section 364.12(2), it requires cities to keep sidewalks in good repair except to the extent the city has served notice of a needed repair on the abutting property owner, and even then the property owner’s liability is limited to the cost of repair. See Iowa Code § 364.12(2) (2009). Iowa City’s ordinance is an effort by the City to alter this statutory division of responsibility between city and property owner. Simply stated, the City wants the property owner to do more to maintain City-owned sidewalks, so that the City may do less. This conflicts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. KaczinskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. Tim Neal v. Annett Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Staff Management and New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Pascuala JimenezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Peffers v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. Goodenow v. City Council of MaquoketaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API