Legal Opinion

Specialty House, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 18, 1954No. C. D. 1596PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The two suits listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, were filed by the plaintiffs seeking to recover certain sums of money alleged to have been illegally exacted as customs duties upon importations of silk articles from Japan. The collector classified this merchandise as handkerchiefs, hemmed, valued at not more than $5 per dozen, and levied duty thereon at the rate of 60 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1209 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Plaintiffs claim said merchandise to be properly dutiable at 35 per centum ad valorem under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nelson J. Elliott v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. 200 Chests of TeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. The MargaretSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ashear Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni Imperial Rug Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Henry Wedemeyer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API