Legal Opinion

Hasson v. Bruzel

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 15, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is on a bill of interpleader under the Mechanics' Lien act.

The complainants allege that a contract was entered into between Jack Hasson, as agent for Joseph Hasson as owner, with one Samuel Bruzel, contractor, for alterations of and repairs to certain premises in Atlantic City, and that by reason thereof there is due the defendant Bruzel the sum of $6,745.50, and have paid that amount into court.

Bruzel alleges that in addition thereto there is due him for extra work a large sum. He testifies that the owner agreed to pay him the sum of $5,000 for all extra work. He also testifies to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNab & Harlin Manufacturing Co. v. Paterson Building Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  2. Slingerland v. BinnsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  3. Daley v. Somers Lumber Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  4. Kreutz v. CramerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
  5. Daley v. Somers Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. JAS. FALCONE PLUMBING & HEATING CO. INC. v. PasqualeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API