Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Romanic

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1933No. Appeal, 23PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

The appellant, Dominic Romanic, charged with the killing of one Joe Jordon (Giordano), was found guilty of murder of the second degree and sentenced to imprisonment for a period of not less than seven years and six months and not more than fifteen years; he then took this appeal, alleging trial errors.

Romanic and Jordon were residents of Creekside, Indiana County, and lived on the same street, in almost adjoining houses. On January 11, 1932, Jordon left his home in the early morning to go to work and shortly thereafter met Romanic, who shot him three times in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PrincipattiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Commonwealth v. VaranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. LuccittiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Commonwealth v. SzachewiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Commonwealth v. StraesserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. WuchererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. CarboneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API