Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Alexander v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 14, 1980No. CR 79-180Published

1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Chief Justice

The majority has reached a result that is inevitable and necessarily correct, however regrettable it may be that one who seems to have been guilty of the crime with which he was charged beyond a reasonable doubt will escape punishment. It is the primary function of the judicial system to preserve the rule of law, even if the guilty do escape punishment as a result of the courts’ facing up to their responsibility.

This court has spoken on the purpose of speedy trial rules in reference to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-1708 (Repl. 1977). In Ware v. State, 159 Ark. 540, 252 S.W. 934, we said:

*** But, as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re BegerowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Beaumont v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Harkness v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  5. Ware v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API