Alexander v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Chief Justice
The majority has reached a result that is inevitable and necessarily correct, however regrettable it may be that one who seems to have been guilty of the crime with which he was charged beyond a reasonable doubt will escape punishment. It is the primary function of the judicial system to preserve the rule of law, even if the guilty do escape punishment as a result of the courts’ facing up to their responsibility.
This court has spoken on the purpose of speedy trial rules in reference to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-1708 (Repl. 1977). In Ware v. State, 159 Ark. 540, 252 S.W. 934, we said:
*** But, as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re BegerowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Beaumont v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Harkness v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Ware v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.