Legal Opinion

Crosse v. Board of Supervisors of Elections of Baltimore City

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 21, 1966No. [No. 223, September Term, 1966 (Adv.).]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oppenheimer, J-,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

After argument, by per curiam order, we reversed the order of the Superior Court of Baltimore City which denied the appellant’s petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the Board of Supervisors of Elections of Baltimore City to accept and: certify his candidacy for Sheriff of Baltimore City, and ordered that the mandate directing the writ of mandamus prayed for below be issued forthwith. The reasons for our order follow.

The question involved is whether the appellant is qualified to become a candidate under the provisions of Article IV…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. State ex rel. Board of PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  4. City of Minneapolis v. ReumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  5. Risewick v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rucker v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Ramírez de Ferrer v. Mari BrásSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1997
  3. Abrams v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Secretary of State v. McGuckenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Sheriff of Balto. City v. AbshireCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API