Legal Opinion

James v. Golson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1915No. 399. [fn†]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error^from District Court, Culberson. County; Dan M. Jackson, Judge. Action by Mrs. Myrtle B. James and husband against G. A. Golson. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Myrtle B. James sued Gol-son, to recover damages alleged to have arisen and to have been sustained through the conveyance by Golson to Mrs. James of 5.83 acres of land out of the northwesterly corner of a certain section of public free school land. Golson and Mrs. James had been husband and wife, and some years previously had separated and had entered into a separation contract, whereby Golson agreed to convey to her certain property, a portion thereof being the above-mentioned 5.83-acrp tract, and in said contract it was agreed that the mother should have custody of the children for one half…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heinsohn v. ChandlerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
  2. Cole v. AddisonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Fidelity-Ph&338nix Fire Ins. Co. v. O'BannonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Fidelity-Ph&338nix Fire Ins. Co. v. O'BannonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API