Gorman v. Murphy Diesel Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, Chief Justice:
These are general demurrers to declarations alleging substantially the same facts. It is alleged that the defendant was the manufacturer of internal combustion engines, commonly known as Diesel engines or motors; that such engines are imminently dangerous in that they operate through the explosion of vapors and gases produced by oil, which explosions if not controlled and confined by proper cylinders, pistons and other appliances will endanger the life and safety of persons in the vicinity of such engine; that the plaintiff was an employee of George A. Fuller Company and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Johnson v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Loop v. . LitchfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Heizer v. Kingsland & Douglass Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Friday v. SmootSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Ciociola v. Delaware Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Vrooman v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.