Legal Opinion

Ewurs v. Pakenham

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 29, 1972No. 72-81PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

delivered .the opinion of the court:

The plaintiff, Robert Ewurs, brought an action in La Salle County claiming damages due to battery committed on his person by defendant Robert Pakenham. Robert Pakenham’s father, Justin Pakenham, was joined as a defendant on the theory that Robert Pakenham was acting as his agent and employee when he committed the battery. Defendant Robert Pakenham admitted the battery but alleged self-defense as an affirmative defense to the action for damages. Defendant Justice Pakenham denied any liability for his son’s actions. A trial was held and the jury found for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The People v. DwyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Irwin Ex Rel. Irwin v. Omar Bakeries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. People v. MastinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Locher v. KlugaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Thompson v. PetitAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. Winn v. InmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. People v. DailyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. First Midwest Bank of Waukegan v. DensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API