Legal Opinion

Pettett v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1924No. 15482PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. In the absence of an allegation charging wilful and wanton negligence, no recovery can be had in this State on account of mere fright, nervous shock, or mental suffering; but even for mere negligence, if the fright, shock, or mental suffering results naturally in mental or physical impairment, that is to say, if the knowledge of the defendant was or should have been such that the resulting injury could under the circumstances have been reasonably foreseen and anticipated as the direct, natural, and probable consequence of his act, a recovery against him may be had, and in such a ease the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Goddard v. WattersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  3. Hines v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. HartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Candler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Young v. Western & Atlantic RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Pollard v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Strickland v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Gardner v. Newnan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API