Aiken v. Aiken
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HOBSON, Justice.
This appeal grows out of divorce proceedings wherein, on application of the plaintiff-appellant wife, a writ of ne exeat was issued and the husband was required to make bond in the amount of $2,000, which was posted for him by one Meyer Possick, doing business as the Meyer Bail Bonding Company. The writ commanded that the $2,000 security be conditioned “that the said Stanley H. Aiken [husband] will not go nor attempt to go into parts beyond this state without leave of this Court and that he will abide by and comply with all lawful orders and decrees of this Court; * * * ”
After…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morgareidge v. HoweySupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Singletary v. MannSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Pan American Surety Co. v. WaltersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- American Surety Co. v. GedneySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Buonanno v. Caldwell Ex Rel. BuonannoSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beveridge v. BeveridgeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Siravo v. SiravoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1976