Carswell v. Canno
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Presiding Justice.
The Court of Appeals, and not this court, has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this litigation. The contention in a motion and in the bill of exceptions that the trial judge in refusing to allow an amendment to an intervention, which intervention had been previously dismissed, denied the intervenor due process of law under the State and Federal Constitutions does not constitute a case involving “the construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia or of the United States, . . .” Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV (Code Ann. § 2-3704). Norman v. State,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Jarvis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Dunn Motors Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969