Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Blice v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 26, 2002No. 5D01-2718Published

1ConcurrenceThompson, C.J.

I agree that Blice’s arrest resulted from a valid Terry1 stop. However, I write to address two issues raised by defense counsel during oral argument. Defense counsel argued that the officers’ initial contact with Blice was illegal since under no standard did the officers have a right to stop him. Further, defense counsel argued that since a portion of the gun could be seen, and the officers knew it to be a gun, they could not detain Blice because it was *449apparent that the gun was not concealed. Therefore, it is argued, the fruits of the illegal stop should have been suppressed. See Jackson v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Ensor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API