Legal Opinion

People's Counsel v. Elm Street Development, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 2, 2007No. 9 September Term, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KRAUSER, Judge.

Appellants are People’s Counsel for Baltimore County; Maryland Line Area Association; Richard McQuaid; and Marion V. Runkles, III. 1 Appellees are Elm Street Development, Inc. (“Elm Street”) and Baltimore County. The Baltimore County Board of Appeals approved Elm Street’s development plan for a parcel of land known as the “Miller-Tipper property,” based in part on two County agencies’ recommendations that the plan complied with the relevant zoning regulations. When the Circuit Court for Baltimore County affirmed the decision, appellants noted this appeal, arguing that the Board…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Klauenberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Moats v. City of HagerstownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Wesley Chapel Bluemount Ass'n v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Neal v. CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION BOARDCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API