Wright v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carlisle, Judge.
1. The defendant was indicted at the January term of the Laurens Superior Court for seduction. Before the adjournment of that term, the defendant filed with the clerk in open court' a demand duly verified for trial upon the indictment. Said demand was filed and recorded by the clerk, but it does not appear from the motion for a new trial that the demand was ever presented to the trial judge and ordered allowed or spread upon the minutes of the court as required by law.. Code § 27-1901; Couch v. State, 28 Ga. 64; Hunley v. State, 105 Ga. 636, 639 (31 S. E. 543); Graham v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McNabb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Hunley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Couch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Odum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Plemons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MarshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Jeffries v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Dickerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.