Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Edw. J. Dunnigan, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1931No. 23054. En BancPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— In November, 1929, appellant was engaged in state highway construction in Kittitas county. The work was being done under one McGuire, as general superintendent of appellant, he having entire supervision and control of the work under the contract between appellant and the state. A heavy blast under the direction of this superintendent dislodged a greater quantity of rock than was anticipated; and it soon became apparent that the highway, the only road over the Cascade mountains from Seattle to Ellensburg and Yakima, would be closed to traffic for eight or nine hours, contrary to the contract…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Messenger v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. B. & B. Building Material Co. v. Winston Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Locomotive Exchange, Inc. v. Rucker Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Laucks v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Pregent v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lawson v. HelmichWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Carver v. KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Helf v. Hansen & Keller Truck Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. Chef-Reddy Foods Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Crutcher v. Scott Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API