Legal Opinion

Virginian Ry. Co. v. Linkous

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1916No. 1379PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke; Henry Clay McDowell, Judge. On rehearing. Former opinion (230 Fed. 88, 144 C. C. A. 386), reversing judgment below, adhered to.

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge.

The above-entitled cause was decided at the November term, 1915, of this court, the court holding that the defendant in error, under the circumstances, was not entitled to recover. A petition for rehearing was presented December 25, 1915, and the case was reargued at this term.

Having fully discussed the question as to whether the injury of the defendant in error was due in whole or in part to the negligence of a fellow servant, in the opinion heretofore announced, we do not now deem it necessary to enter into a further discussion of that phase of the case. After a…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. SorrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Davis v. PayneOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Linkous v. Virginian Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
  4. Pheasant v. Director General of RailroadsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
  5. Youngblood v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API