Legal Opinion

Sterling McConnell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1970No. 28272_1Published

1Per curiam

This is a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act in which the District Court, Southern District of Florida, found that the Government’s agent, Jones (hereinafter defendant) negligently operated his automobile, proximately causing plaintiff’s injury, but that plaintiff’s negligence contributed to his injury, thus barring recovery under Florida’s contributory negligence law.

On this appeal the plaintiff alleges that the district court committed two reversible errors: (1) the admission into evidence of testimony of the police officer who investigated the accident, and (2) the Conclusion of Law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gosma v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Haislet v. CrowleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Holmes v. SurfusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Joaquin Matuk, Jessie Matuk and Mary Jo Fox v. Russell Harper, Russell Harper, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Jessie Matuk, Counter-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API