Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Burke v. Commissioners of Bessemer City

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

AotioN heard by consent by Ferguson, J., at chambers in Charlotte, 27 September, 1907, from GastoN. Defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

OlaeK, 0. J.

This is a mandamus to compel the town commissioners of Bessemer to reinstate the relator in the office of town treasurer, from which he had been removed by them, and to approve the bond tendered by him. The court, without passing upon the prayer to compel reinstatement, ordered the defendants to “accept and approve” the bond tendered.

The facts of this controversy are set out in the quo war-ranto proceedings — Burke v. Jenkins, ante, 25 (which are hereby referred to and made a part of this case), in which it was adjudged that the relator was not entitled to recover said office.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Barnes v. Commissioners.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Glenn v. Commissioners.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Ellison v. Aldermen of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Buckman v. Commissioners of BeaufortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Freeman v. PonderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Rhodes v. LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Bunn v. . BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State Ex Rel. Placeres v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Rhodes v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API