Legal Opinion
George v. Willman
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1963No. 234PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
The appellee, Willman, purchased a Great Lakes Mobile Home trailer from appellants, George and Glover. The trailer and its contents were destroyed by fire. Willman sued appellants for the loss on theories of breach of implied warranty and negligence. The trial court found that the fire was caused by loose fuel line fittings, and concluded that since this defect existed at the time of sale, appellants had “breached an implied warranty of fitness that the trailer was suitable for the purposes intended.” The court also found that appellants were negligent in failing to check the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Nordin v. ZimmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Knapp v. Willys-Ardmore, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- In Re Kraft's EstateAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Italia Societa Rer Azioni Di Navigazione v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Dougall v. Brown Bay Boat Works and Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.