State v. Brown
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Frank R. Brown was convicted of having carnal knowledge of a female between thirteen and eighteen years of age. He appeals.
1ConcurrenceMeCARTY, J.
The only evidence against the defendant was the uncorroborated testimony of the prosecutrix. Her father, who was a ■witness for the state, testified that, before she went to live at the home of the defendant, he had “neglected the child”; that she had “been practically on the street, running free and doing as she pleased”; that he “was advised to get her a place to stay”; and that he “knew she was going wrong.” The prosecutrix testified:
That she, on several occasions, had sexual intercourse with defendant prior to the commission of the act for which he was tried and convicted; that on one…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- State v. HilbergUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Herstine v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.