Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Carmichael

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1936No. 11442Published

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, Presiding Justice.

This is a suit for injunction and other equitable relief. The main facts in the ease appear in the former report of the case. Hudson v. Carmichael, 181 Ca. 317 (181 S. E. 853). On the last trial the jury returned a verdict for the defendant; and upon examina*217lion of the record we are of the opinion that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. There are no special assignments of error.

No. 11442. October 15, 1936. A. F. Jenkins and Miles W. Lems, for plaintiff. C. S. Baldwin Jr., for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hudson v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API