Legal Opinion

State v. Lawrence

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 2, 1990No. 89-1707PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Judge.

The state appeals the trial court’s granting of appellee’s motion to suppress.

A date was set to hear the motion to suppress physical evidence. The state requested a continuance when its only witness failed to appear at the hearing. The trial judge denied the motion to continue and granted the motion to suppress after the state rested without presenting any evidence to justify the warrantless search.

The real issue is whether the state’s motion for continuance should have been granted.

Denying a motion for continuance is within a trial judge’s discretion and his or her ruling will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bouie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. State v. ReedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. McCarthyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. State v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. State of Florida v. Ariel PaulDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  4. State v. DicklerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. State v. RoyCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API