Legal Opinion

Barbizon Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 16, 1962No. C.D. 2309PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fokd, Judge:

In the case of Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 18, C.D. 2308, decided concurrently, we lield certain nylon girdles, in part lace, to be properly dutiable under the provisions of paragraph 1529 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, as classified by the collector of customs, rather than under the provisions of paragraph 1529(c) of said act, as modified, as claimed by plaintiff therein.

The case at bar involves substantially the same basic issue, although the classification herein is under a different section of paragraph 1529(a). The merchandise involved…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API