State v. Williams
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court correctly quashed the warrants on the grounds that they charged violations of an ordinance which was invalid for the reason that it was “a local ordinance which purports to override a statute applicable to the entire State.”
Defendants’ motions to quash raise the question of the sufficiency of the warrants to charge the commission of a criminal offense. State v. Vestal, 281 N.C. 517, 189. S.E. 2d 152 (1972); State v. Brewer, 258 N.C. 533, 129 S.E. 2d 262 (1962). It is essential to jurisdiction that a criminal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. McBaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kaplan v. Prolife Action League of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Greene v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Craig v. County of ChathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Hursey v. Town of GibsonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Lamar Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Hendersonville Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.