Legal Opinion

In Re Schmalz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The petitioner, H. Y. Schmalz, an attorney, was accused by the Oregon State Bar of unprofessional conduct, and, after a hearing, was found guilty. The Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar has recommended that he be permanently disbarred from the practice of law. Schmalz has sought review of the recommendation pursuant to the provisions of 4 O. C. L. A., § 47-213.

The charges, nine in number, relate to the conduct of the petitioner as executor of the estate of Sarah Hamilton Brown, deceased. He was found guilty on all the charges except one, which was withdrawn at the hearing. With some…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re LiceagaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  2. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re KokenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. In Re SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API