Legal Opinion

Ambercroft Trading Limited v. Chris Biddy

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 10, 2020No. 3:19-cv-06810Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 AMBERCROFT TRADING LIMITED, Case No. 19-CV-06810-LHK et al., 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; DENYING 14 v. AS MOOT MOTIONS TO DISMISS; AND STAYING CASE 15 CHRIS BIDDY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 18 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court are Defendants Astro Digital US, Inc., Astro Digital, Inc., and Chris 19 Biddy’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 13; Defendants’ Mikhail Kokorich and Liudmila Kokorich’s 20 motion to compel arbitration, ECF No. 15; and Defendants’…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API