Legal Opinion

People v. Engelman

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2002No. S086462PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

In this case we consider whether trial courts should advise juries in the terms of CALJIC No. 17.41.1, a recently drafted pattern jury instruction given in criminal cases. This instruction informs jurors at the outset of jury deliberations that “should . . . any juror refuse[] to deliberate or expressQ an intention to disregard the law or to decide the case based on penalty or punishment, or any other improper basis, it is the obligation of the other jurors to immediately advise the Court of the situation.” (CALJIC No. 17.41.1 (1998 new) (6th ed. 1996).)

We agree with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. FuiavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API