Legal Opinion

Moss v. Standard Brands, Inc.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided December 15, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fritz W. Alexander, II, J.

It appearing that there is no dispute as to the facts in the instant case, the parties by agreement, have waived trial by jury and ¡submitted the sole question of law to the court for final resolution.

*626The agreed facts are as follows: This plaintiff, Myer Moss (hereinafter “ Moss ”), was involved in an automobile accident in June, 1964, with a vehicle owned by Standard Brands, Inc. He thereafter retained one Richard A. Hornstein, an attorney, to prosecute the claim for him against Standard Brands, Inc. Normal litigation procedures ensued culminating in a settlement of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benjamin Brownstein, Successor Trustee-Appellant v. Aluminum Reserve Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. McCoy v. BarclayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hutzler v. Hertz Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Enjay Chemical Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. Dobbins v. National Union InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
  4. Hutzler v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API