Percival v. McGinnis
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Leon Percival appeals a district court order dismissing his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Percival and another prisoner, Anthony Garvins, sued the director of the Michigan Department of Corrections and a case manager at the Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility, alleging that the defendants violated their First Amendment, Eighth Amendment, and equal protection…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dwight E. Freeman v. Warden Francis Corrections Officer Shoemaker Nurse KentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Greg Curry v. David ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bailey v. DeckerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Barnett v. AndersonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Barnett v. McCormickDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Barnett v. PhillipsDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Bostic v. MehrDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.