Legal Opinion

Perez v. Boston Housing Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 10, 1975PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, J.

In this case we hold, as clearly required by the applicable law, that the Commonwealth has no duty to provide funds for the rehabilitation of certain property of the Boston Housing Authority (BHA). However, we emphasize the disturbing social implications of this holding (infra, part 2).

Certain appellants, namely the Commissioner of the Department of Community Affairs, the Secretary of Communities and Development, the Treasurer of the Commonwealth, and the Governor of the Commonwealth, appeal from a judgment (the “final decree”) entered by a judge of the Housing Court of the City of Boston…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Hansen v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. West Broadway Task Force, Inc. v. Commissioner of Department of Community AffairsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Cameron v. Zoning Agent of BellinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Perez v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Spence v. ReederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Darmetko v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Negron v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Department of Community Affairs v. Massachusetts State College Building AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API