Legal Opinion

Falk v. Beeckman

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 23, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from trial term. Action by Frank Falk against Leonard Beeckman, for the contract price of work done by plaintiff for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from judgment dismissing.his complaint,

1Per curiam

The contract provides that the work to be done was to be paid for every two weeks, as the work progressed. The action was to recover $2,000, the contract price. Upon the proofs the plaintiff may not have been entitled to recover this sum; but it does not follow, where the contract price was payable in installments every two weeks, as the work• progressed, that the plaintiff was entitled to recover nothing. The trial judge dismissed the complaint, but the'printed case fails to show the ground- upon wrhich the dismissal w7as granted. The defects in the plaintiff’s proofs ought to have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newton v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Binsse v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Devoe v. BrandtNew York Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Furguson v. United States Land & Investment Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API