Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Joseph N. Palladino, Joseph N. Palladino, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 25, 1973No. 72-1005Published

1ConcurrenceLevin H. Campbell, Circuit Judge

I would be tempted to follow Judge Aldrich’s dissenting views were I not of the opinion that the law, as it now stands, precludes our doing so. However, were I to do so it would be with these qualifications:

I think the most potent objection to the Roth test rests on the virtual impossibility of applying it. “Obscenity” or “pornography” is not a word susceptible to close analysis and definition. Essentially they are pejoratives, indicating material which arouses disgust in someone. Unless one is to sanction banning all materials which any substantial body of opinion might regard as disgusting—…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API