Legal Opinion · Dissent

Upper Midwest Booksellers Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 31, 1985No. 85-5077Published

1DissentLay, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent.

If the first amendment means anything, it should be clear that the Minneapolis ordinance is unconstitutional on its face. In dissenting, I am not unmindful of a government’s public concern for the well-being of its youth. Before we condone paternalistic censorship by government in a free society, however, this court, as has every. other court addressing similar laws, must be certain that such legislation (1) respects the constitutional rights of both adults and minors by not unduly encroaching on the basic freedoms we enjoy through free speech and free press and (2) is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API