Legal Opinion

Chappell v. Real Estate Pooling Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 16, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Ritchie, J.) The cause was submitted to the Court on briefs by:

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.

The appellee instituted in the Baltimore City Court an action of ejectment against the appellant for undivided half interest in a lot of ground in that city. No one acquainted with the practice in this State in such actions would imagine, from reading the declaration, that it would be possible to have so many pleas, motions and other papers filed in defence of a suit of that character as can be found in this record. As might be expected, many of them are wholly irrelevant and have no application to the issues that are proper in ejectment proceedings and could only result in increasing the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tyson v. RickardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1810
  2. Ragan v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1841
  3. Rimmey v. GettermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wash., B. A.R. Co. v. KimmeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  2. Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Electric Railroad v. KimmeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  3. Kinealy v. O'ReillyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Merryman v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  5. Chappell v. Real Estate Pooling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API