Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Upstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 28, 2021No. 17-9001Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L (Filed: January 28, 2021) IN RE UPSTREAM ADDICKS AND BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD- Application of the deliberative process privilege; CONTROL RESERVOIRS protection of pre-decisional and deliberative materials; no protection for factual materials that can be segregated; no governmental waiver THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: ALL UPSTREAM CASES Daniel H. Charest and E. Lawrence Vincent, Burns Charest LLP, Dallas, Texas, Charles Irvine, Irvine & Conner PLLC, Houston, Texas, and Edwin Armistead Easterby, Williams Hart Boundas Easterby,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API