Legal Opinion

Paurley v. Harris

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1956No. 8279PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Justice.

On a prior appeal, this case was reversed and remanded because the trial court struck certain affirmative allegations from defendants’ answer and rejected certain offered proofs. Paurley v. Harris, 75 Idaho 112, 268 P.2d 351.

Briefly, the facts as disclosed at the second trial are: Lillian Ferrell, a widow, the owner of lots 1, 2 and 3, block 2, Lovers’ Lane Addition to Boise City, Ada County, Idaho, on June 30, 1947, entered into a written agreement with the defendants (appellants) to sell them the north one-half of the above-mentioned property.

About August 4, 1947,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HoffIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Howay v. HowayIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Paurley v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Smith v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Wright v. RosebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DrapeauIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. O'DELL v. BasabeIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Aztec Ltd., Inc. v. Creekside Inv. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Harman v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Gayhart Ex Rel. Gayhart v. SchwabeIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API