Legal Opinion
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 24, 2020No. 2:16-cv-01669Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civ. A. No. 16-1669 v. ) Senior Judge Nora Barry Fischer ) INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION This is an action under the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), in which the Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) alleges that Defendant Innovative Designs, Inc. (“IDI”) violated Section 5(a) of the FTC Act (“Section 5(a)”), 15 U.S.C. § 45(a). (Docket No. 1 ¶ 1). A non-jury trial was commenced before the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hayman Cash Register Co. v. SarokinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.