Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1997No. 96-2781PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This matter is pending before the court upon the filing by respondent of a motion for reconsideration.

*1496Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and is, hereby, granted, and that respondent’s suspension is made coextensive with his new federal probationary period that ended July 22, 1997. It is further ordered by the court, sua sponte, that respondent may seek reinstatement to the practice of law by filing an application for reinstatement pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 189, 680 N.E.2d 972.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DukatOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DukatOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. DukatOhio Supreme Court · 1998