Legal Opinion

Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 29, 1989No. Civ. A. 86-304-CMWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.

This protracted litigation involves withdrawal liability under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1461. The Court returns to this action for a decision on the motion of defendant Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia & Vicinity (“the Fund”) for attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with its successful motion for summary judgment for an award of interim payments.

I. STATUS OF CASE

This suit commenced in July, 1986, when plaintiffs The Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Tiger International,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Jaime Blum, Brij Kapur and James C. Spitsbergen, in 86-5349 v. Witco Chemical Corporation, in 86-5310Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Secretary of Department of Labor, First American National Bank-Eastern, Intervenor/plaintiff-Appellee v. E. William King, the Crown Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. Gold v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Building Service Local 47 Cleaning Contractors Pension Plan, (93-4133) v. Grandview Raceway, Northeast Ohio Harness, (93-3998/4054)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API