Parker v. . Arctic Fire Ins. Co.

The judge on the trial found that the defendant was orally notified before the renewal of the policy that steam power had been introduced into the mill, and consented to continue the insurance, after notice of the change, and thereupon the plaintiffs paid the premium for another year, and received a renewal certificate from the company. The fact of notice was denied by the defendant, but there is evidence tending to support the conclusion of the judge, upon that question.

The policy contained a provision, that in case of any change of risk, not made known to the company by the assured, at the…