Legal Opinion
MD Helicopters v. Aerometals, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 31, 2021No. 2:16-cv-02249Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MD HELICOPTERS, INC., No. 2:16-cv-02249-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 AEROMETALS, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Aerometals, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to 18 Disqualify Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher (“Gibson Dunn”) as Plaintiff’s Counsel. (ECF No. 177.) 19 Plaintiff MD Helicopters, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) has filed an opposition (ECF No. 183), and Defendant 20 has filed a reply (ECF No. 199). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion is 21 GRANTED. (ECF No. 177.)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Efron v. Embassy Suites (Puerto Rico), Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Novo Terapeutisk Laboratorium A/s v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Gist-Brocades Fermentation Industries, Inc., and Gist-Brocades N. V.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- City & County of San Francisco v. Cobra Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.